Showing posts with label Scottish. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scottish. Show all posts

Thursday, 24 November 2022

Scotland is a paradox. We can freely leave the UK, but we also can't?

It has taken me several years to resurrect this blog. I have thought about it with the creation of Alba and my subsequent meeting with like minds.  #ALBAforIndependence #AlbaStandsForScotland #AlbaRising


I joined the SNP to gain independence for Scotland. I didn’t join the SNP because of Alex Salmond or Nicola Sturgeon. And that also applied to Jim Sillars, Gordon Wilson, Winnie Ewing or anyone else. I did it because their arguments were best, and once I looked into it economically there was no doubt. Democratically there was no doubt. Culturally and with my heart there was more doubt. I could see culturally, arguments for and against staying within the Greater England project of 1603 and 1707. Culturally I needed to be convinced. Ironic because that became one of Better Together’s lines during in 2014, ‘Think with your head to stay in the Union, not with your heart for Scotland’s independence’. My feelings were weighted the opposite way round. 


I left the SNP in the 2000s because of the lack lustre leadership of John Swinney and the unfortunate episode with Clause 28. Being a gay man this really stuck in my craw. They were standing in the way of equality (ironically they are doing it again in 2022 under different leadership this time backed up wholeheartedly by the Scottish Green Party). This won't be happening if many women and others in Scotland have anything to do with it, or if it does there will be long term problems with this legislation. #WomenWontWheesht #NoToSelfID


That soon passed once Alex Salmond came back to the helm. And equality and anti discrimination came to the fore. Plus he called Scotland’s government Scotland’s Government which it most definitely was. London still held most of the purse strings and still do to this day. And that control has increased with Brexit which was one of the reasons I voted against that (but could still see some arguments for it. although none of them have come to pass. The people you vote for to carry something out are almost as important as the thing you are voting for, and it was blindingly obvious that those elected by England to do this on our behalf were not in it to improve life of any particular part of the UK, let alone Scotland – they were in it for where they were, and to improve their own lives). 



I had rejoined the SNP in 2014 after the official ‘No’ vote but with little enthusiasm for party politics again. It was made abundantly clear that I and many others who were the most active for Scottish Independence during the independence campaign were not welcome. Having been bullied and pilloried for a number of years I eventually gave up the ghost in 2017. 

Who can I vote for? There are further links to incidents, happenings and processes within SNP Provan.

And now we come to Wednesday 23rd November 2022. The day on which the UK Supreme Court made its judgement on whether Scotland had, within the UK, the right to have a second Independence Referendum. Sovereignty in Scotland’s lies with it’s people and the representatives elected by those people. In England sovereignty lies with its Parliament. This creates a fundamental problem within the UK as these sovereignties are entirely different. 


Salvo video introducing the Scottish Constitution.


More information can be found on the salvo.scot website.

The highest court in the land of Scotland is the Court of Session for civil matters. To state that the UK Supreme Court has a greater power breaks the Articles of Union between the 2 countries. So it is questionable whether this matter should have been referred to this court in the first place. 

Secondly we know the previous outcome of a very similar case a few years ago instigated and carried through by Martin J Keatings which also went to court and the outcome was that this question could not by answered by the Court hypothetically. The Scottish Government would have to legislate before the basis of the argument could be contested. 


This was one of the possible outcomes for today, i.e. a repeat of the outcome of before. At the time of this case the SNP for whatever reason didn’t want to know the answer, as it seemed to put everything possible in the way of Martin Keating's case. 


Wednesday 23rd November's outcome was an absolute ‘NO’ which to me is best outcome in our current situation. However I personally believe Scotland should be in a much better position. Frequently over the last few years I really question whether the SNP has been trying to achieve Scottish Independence at all with its mis-steps, active persecution of strident voices for it, and the squashing of even discussion about it at the party's conference. 

As ‘Wings Over Scotland' has said today and I quote… ‘You can argue legitimately that Scotland is not a colony. You can argue legitimately that Scotland is not a country and gave up its people’s right to self-determination. What you cannot do is legitimately argue both, because the two assertions contradict each other in the most absurdly direct and blatant way.’ 

This will annoy more people. As to how many people it will annoy will be interesting to see. The question of who can decide on Scotland’s future was decided a long time ago. 

In 1950 a petition was raised (known as the Scottish Covenant) which stated that Scotland should again have its own Parliament. It gained 2 million signatures, and then was quietly ignored. This ultimately led to the unexpected removal of the Stone of Destiny from Westminster Abbey, to which it was then returned, until retracing its journey back to Scotland ‘on loan’ in 1996. 

Newsreel from 1951 about the removal of the Stone of Destiny from Westminster Abbey.



More about Ian Hamilton.


1996: The Stone of Destiny is returned from England to Scotland


As an aside in 1975 Scotland voted to join the EU, or the EEC as it was then. At that time this was against SNP policy I believe. 


In 1979 we had a referendum where a majority of voters voted to have a Scottish Assembly. Because of the way the referendum was set up however Scotland didn’t get its Assembly. But nor did it do anything worthwhile afterwards about getting it. This swindle was what switched me on to Scotland’s position in the UK. 

The video below 'Scotland's Oil: A Case for Scottish Independence' puts this in context, and sums up perfectly all the reasons which made into a believer and supporter of Scottish Independence.


In 2014 there were some irregularities about how the whole thing was conducted. 

There was the blatant use of existing sources of media by the British state. See below for video re this. 'Writing Off Scotland: Press Bias during the 2014 referendum. 


There was the breaking of purdah offering something which appeared substantial by the British state (the infamous Vow which has still not been delivered due mainly the Scottish Parliament not being made permanent).


There were very odd things about the day of actual voting. A number of times on the day raised a red flag being outside a polling station for most of it. And then there were odd things as regards some voting papers, at the counts themselves, and then reports of bags of discarded votes left in odd places. There was also no mechanism for a recount. The voting papers were discarded quickly and 'Better Together' people seemed to know the postal votes outcomes prior to the day of voting itself. Please see below John McTernan stating that No votes are dominant on 14th September 2014, with the actual vote taking place several days later.


Personally at the moment if I had been on that committee of Judges on the UK Supreme Court I would have passed a different judgement. With the seemingly almost moribund nature of the SNP leadership and therefore Scotland’s current Government particularly on the matter of Scottish Independence, and the lacklustre involvement of the Yes Movement (with a few notable exceptions) as the SNP’s lack of leadership and vision has drained enthusiasm I would have put the proverbial cat amongst the SNP pigeons. I would have said you do have the powers to hold a second Scottish Independence Referendum, but only before or on the day of 19th October 2023 the date Nicola Sturgeon said she would hold one, no ‘ifs’ no ‘buts’. 




I have no belief whatsoever that the SNP is any way ready to have a second Scottish Independence Referendum. So if I had been fighting for the UK this is the option I would have picked. It would have completely hamstrung the SNP and left it in disarray. Of course I have believed in Scottish Independence since our ‘democratic’ referendum to have an Assembly in 1979, so I am pleased at the outcome. If anything can raise Scotland from its slumber this will. Given the initial reaction of the SNP leadership it certainly hasn’t roused them. So it must come from other sources; Salvo, Alba, ISP, etc. Is it going to come from you? Or do you not care about Scotland or its people?

Alex Salmond Salmond response to UK Supreme Court ruling.


A response from SALVO.






Friday, 24 March 2017

Journey to Yes #10


Jackie says Yes. As more Scots who voted No to independence reconsider their decision, we follow their journey to Yes and self-determination for Scotland. Jackie Kemp is a writer living in Edinburgh and recent author of 'Politics on the Hill, an Edinburgh View', a stunning essay reflecting on Scotland's changing post-Brexit identity that has resonated with people across the poltical spectrum. Jackie campaigned against independence in 2014 alongside long-serving Scottish Labour politician Tam Dalyell who himself described devolution as "a motorway without exit to a Scottish state". Jackie reflects on her disillusion with the UK's current constitutional settlement (England has left us) and how Brexit has altered her view of independence which she now sees as vital to maintaining Scotland and Edinburgh's ancient links with Europe.

You can read 'Politics on the Hill, an Edinburgh View' and Jackie Kemp's other writing @ http://www.jackiekemp.scot/

10th and final in this series.

phantompower2014@gmail.com

Monday, 20 March 2017

Journey to Yes #9

Mark says Yes. We follow different people's fascinating journeys to Yes and self-determination for Scotland. Londoner and businessman Mark followed Scotland's first independence debate closely and had been inspired by the Yes campaign with its progressive and inclusive values. After the Brexit result, Mark was impressed by Scotland's pro-EU vote and the Scottish Government's handling of events. In November 2016 Mark sold his London home and moved with business and family to set-up in Scotland and join the Yes campaign. Mark reflects on the UK Government's handling of Brexit and Scotland's huge potential as an enlightened, open and independent nation. 

https://twitter.com/projectfarceuk
https://twitter.com/markmckergow

Ninth in the series.

If you'd like to share your journey to Yes - get in touch @ phantompower2014@gmail.com.



Journey to Yes #8

Elizabeth says Yes. As more Scots who voted No to independence reconsider their decision, we follow their journey to Yes and self-determination for Scotland. Scotland is a small business nation. There are around 350,000 Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) operating in Scotland, providing an estimated 1.2 million jobs. Elizabeth owns a cosmetics business that depends on exports and the EU single market. Her decision to vote no was guided by fears that Scotland might not gain membership of the EU. The election of a Conservative majority in the 2015 made Elizabeth begin to reflect on her vote. Originally from Alabama, Elizabeth's childhood experiences of segregation instilled a deep distrust of divisive politics. Brexit and rise of increasingly right-wing Tory party caused Elizabeth to reject UK politics and fully rethink her position on independence. Brexit now represents a real and present threat to Elizabeth's business and the workers she supports. Elizabeth explains the barriers to trade that hard Brexit will bring including loss of access to vital EU single market and customs union at the hands of a UK Conservative Govt that does not understand the scale and complexity of Brexit. Scotland is now in a unique position to escape the economic damage Elizabeth believes will diminish the UK economy and can build a new and extraordinary independent nation. 

Eighth in a series. 

NB David Cameron resigned in 2016 and not 2014 as shown. This error will be updated in future.

If you'd like to share your journey to Yes - get in touch @ phantompower2014@gmail.com.


Journey to Yes #7

Erin says Yes. As more Scots who voted No to independence reconsider their decision, we follow their journey to Yes and self-determination for Scotland. Unlike UK General Elections and Brexit, 16 and 17 year olds were empowered with a vote in the Scottish independence referendum. Erin was 13 at the time and was still too young to participate but would have voted No. Erin found herself caught up in the post-indyref fightback and became an active member of the SNP Youth movement. She represents a new generation of politically aware young activists who demand greater representation in Scottish politics. Erin talks about aspects of youth vote in Scotland, opportunities, barriers and how vital it is that young people engage in decisions that will shape their own future. Erin will be 16 this September and is voting Yes at the next independence referendum.

Seventh in a series. 

If you'd like to share your journey to Yes - get in touch @ phantompower2014@gmail.com.


Journey to Yes #6

Christopher says Yes. As more Scots who voted No to independence reconsider their decision, we follow their journey to Yes and self-determination for Scotland. Christopher Graham leads Yes Bikers, a group of motorbike riders who support pro-independence events in Scotland and now Europe. Christopher voted No based on the mainstream media and now feels he did not have all the information needed to make an informed choice. It was a decision Christopher almost instantly regretted and the further betrayal of promises on more powers validated. Scotland now faces a choice between Tory Britain or a journey to self-determination and a more open progressive Scotland. 

For more information:
https://twitter.com/YesBikers
https://www.facebook.com/YesBikers/
http://www.yesbikers.co.uk/

Sixth in a series. 

If you'd like to share your journey to Yes - get in touch @ phantompower2014@gmail.com.



Journey to Yes #5

Tom says Yes. As more Scots who voted No to independence reconsider their decision, we follow their journey to Yes and self-determination for Scotland. Tom Morton is a broadcaster, writer and journalist based in Shetland. For Tom, Scottish independence is a question of moral authority and whether the Scottish people are best served by self-governance. The collapse of Labour, Brexit and the prospect of eternal Tory reign in the UK has transformed the political situation. The independence movement's claims for self-determination now has a clear moral and reasoned case but it will take time to build a strategic campaign because the next indyref must be won.

Fifth in a series. 

If you'd like to share your journey to Yes - get in touch @ phantompower2014@gmail.com.



Journey to Yes #4

Mike says Yes. As more Scots who voted No to independence reconsider their decision, we follow their journey to Yes and self-determination for Scotland. Mike Dailly is the Principal Solicitor of Glasgow's Govan Law Centre and Govanhill Law Centre. Traditionally Labour, Mike was a high profile campaigner for Better Together during the first independence referendum. After the UK Government’s broken promises on more powers, the prospect of decades of Tory austerity and xenophobia, Mike has come to the conclusion that Scotland needs to take a different path now. 

Fourth in a series. 

If you'd like to share your journey to Yes - get in touch @ phantompower2014@gmail.com.



Journey to Yes #3

Caroline says Yes. As more Scots who voted No to independence reconsider their decision, we follow their journey to Yes and self-determination for Scotland. Caroline is a business woman who lives in Edinburgh and is originally from Sussex. Traditionally Conservative, Caroline developed a keen interest in Scottish politics after the first indyref that was to completely alter her view of Scotland’s position in the UK. Caroline discusses the post-Brexit landscape, her concern of the increasingly right-wing populist UK Conservatives, disappointment in Ruth Davidson (Edinburgh voted 75% Remain), the economic implications of staying in a Tory dominated post-EU UK and the huge opportunities of independence for Scotland. 

Third in a series. 

If you'd like to share your journey to Yes - get in touch @ phantompower2014@gmail.com



Journey to Yes #2

Daniel says Yes. As more Scots who voted No to independence reconsider their decision, we follow their journey to Yes and self-determination for Scotland. Daniel is a Dundee based engineer originally from London. Daniel discusses the personal, political and economic impact of the Brexit vote and the need for Scotland to take a different path. 

Second in a series. 

If you'd like to share your journey to Yes - get in touch @ phantompower2014@gmail.com.



Journey to Yes #1

Fraser says Yes. As more Scots who voted No to independence reconsider their decision, we follow their journey to Yes and self-determination for Scotland. Fraser is a Labour member who, let down by the empty promises made by Better Together in the final days of indyref and concerned about an increasingly right-wing UK out of the EU, sees independence as the only choice now. 

First in a series. 

If you'd like to share your journey to Yes - get in touch @ phantompower2014@gmail.com.



Friday, 6 May 2016

SNP WIN AND DOMINATE NEW PARLIAMENT - BUT HAVE THE YOONS OR THE EMPIRE STRUCKBACK?

I don't regret my double SNP vote in the Glasgow region, even although they didn't get a list seat. 

SNP Lucky with D'Hondt in 07 and 11 

 

In 2007 and 2011 the SNP was lucky with the way D'Hondt turned out. This time they were not.

The result is great domestically i.e. within Scotland (and tinkering round the edges of problems) as I believe the minority SNP Govt was better than the majority and the SNP are by far the largest party.

However as an independence supporter I can't see how the green agenda can be furthered in the UK much at the moment. And I have said before I would probably vote green in an independent Scotland.

Has the Empire Struck Back?

So I can't understand the recent rather lukewarm response to Scottish independence from the Scottish Greens recently. I wouldn't bank on them agreeing to another indyref in the next 5 years according to a recent hearsay conversations with Zara Kitson.  However given that she is not now an MSP perhaps that will help a change of mind.

So the cause of of indy may have been delayed. If it has then in a way the Empire in Way has Struck Back. 


A Wonderful Result for the SNP

No matter which way you look at it though it is a wonderful result for the SNP. After 9 years they are still by far the largest party in Holyrood and will form the vast majority of the Government if not all, with other party support in new Scottish Parliament.

Just can't believe the Tory vote or indeed Orkney and Shetland still so strongly for LibDems after Alistair Carmichael. Weird.... Indeed one really does wonder about it as it was such an astonishing one. What local issues in Orkney and Shetland don't we know about.

Thats my view. Not a prob to have a different one. 

I hope my point re indy is proved wrong though!

Friday, 20 November 2015

Scotland: How a Nation was Conned


How Westminster lies conned a nation into voting NO in September 2014.

And why the fight for Scottish Independence will continue until it happens.


A wonderfully enthusing video for people wanting independence for Scotland  and a shaming one for those who don't.


Thursday, 12 November 2015

#CarmichaelMustGo


Its you who lied #AlistairCarmichael.Not the SNP. How can you con your constituents into voting for you in a General Election, get in by under 1000 votes and think this is okay?


#CarmichaelMustGo

"The right to smear an opponent is not one we should be defending." Alistair Carmichael, 2010




If you want to help fight this case on behalf of the people then please donate now at the web address below...
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-people-versus-carmichael#/

Wednesday, 11 November 2015

Episode 2 : Winner Take Nothing begins with the increasingly desperate ‘No’ campaign arranging Her Majesty’s backing. The impact of Project Fear's negativity, elite self-interest, media imbalance and last-minute promises finally proved too much to overcome for the Yes campaign. Interviewees consider aspects of voter behaviour and results as well as flaws in the Yes argument that require attention before considering a second referendum. In a campaign that saw the unionist parties prepared to destroy themselves to win, perhaps the real winner was the newly politically aware Scottish public who are still deeply engaged in a conversation about their constitutional future, a debate that seems destined to arrive at only one conclusion. 

This episode includes interviews with Derek Bateman, Janice Galloway, James Kelly, Paul Kavanagh (Wee Ginger Dug) and Christopher Silver.


This can also be found on Youtube using the link below...
https://youtu.be/-zV1h20li20

This can also be found on the 'Wee Ginger Dug' blog at the address below...
https://weegingerdug.wordpress.com/2015/11/08/altered-state-part-2/

This episode follows on from my post of 30th September.
http://scotcitizen.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/altered-state-critique-on-first.html


Wednesday, 30 September 2015

What is people's problem regarding Homeopathic and Holistic Medical care? Don't let people who know little destroy others lives even more.

What is people's problem regarding Homeopathic and Holistic Medical care? 

ref: http://www.thenational.scot/news/would-be-msp-says-he-will-lead-the-way-in-debate-on-ending-homeopathy-on-nhs.8175 -Would-be MSP says he will lead the way in debate on ending homeopathy on NHS This story in today's 'The National', regarding would be MSP Anas Hassan who is seeking nomination to the SNP list in Mid Scotland and Fife for next years Holyrood election, is just the latest of a long line.

As can be seen from the following stories that have appeared in the press Health Boards (NHS Lothians, NHS Highland, NHS Lanarkshire) seem to be able to opt out of providing badly needed services to patients who can not be helped by conventional medicine.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13193012.Health_board_to_stop_sending_patients_to_homeopathic_hospital/ -
from The Herald: Tuesday 9th December 2014

http://www.thenational.scot/news/integrated-care-unit-faces-death-by-thousand-cuts.3792 -
from The National: Saturday 6th June 2015

http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/13332247.Campaigners_take_fight_for_homeopathic_hospital_to_Holyrood/ from the Glasgow Evening Times: Tuesday 9th June 2015

Despite the jury still being out in the medical establishment holistic and homeopathic medicine can offer very real benefits.
Centre for Integrative Care, Glasgow (formerly Glasgow Homeopathic Hospital)

The amount of money spent on this type of medicine is extremely small

The amount of money spent on this type of medicine is extremely small in comparison to conventional medicine the latter having limited or no effect in many long term seriously life limiting conditions. The most obvious example of the Scottish NHS' lukewarm (I am being generous) committment to this form of medicine is the former Glasgow Homeopathic Hospital which recently several Scottish Health Boards have stopped referring patients to citing no doubt monetary constraints. Please see above stories regarding NHS Lothian, NHS Highland and NHS Lanarkshire.

The NHS Centre for Integrative Care, on the Gartnavel Hospitals site in the west end of Glasgow, offers people with long term conditions a wide range of opportunities to enhance their health and quality of life. Most patients referred to the Centre are experiencing chronic pain, chronic low energy, and/or chronic low mood or anxiety. However, any patient with a long term condition may benefit from the care provided here.
Inside the Centre for Integrative Care, Glasgow

Conventional medicine can have little or no positive effect on many long term life limiting conditions

Take myself as an example.

I have several long term conditions, some of which are severely life limiting. I have CFS (chronic fatigue syndrome) or ME (Myalgic Encephalopathy), fybromyalgia and long term incontinence. Very little can be done for any of these conditions using conventional medicine, and certainly nothing can be done to cure them. Excluding the latter condition (which was incidentally caused by conventional medicine), The Centre for Integrative Care has using holistic and homeopathic therapies have been a great deal more successful than any conventional medicine in their treatments.

holistic and homeopathic therapies have been a great deal more successful than any conventional medicine

I have been through several of their courses all of which to varying degrees have been eye openers and successful. From enabling a greater understanding of the possible causes of my conditions, to offering assistance with diet and supplements to homeopathic medicine, meditation (mindfullness, relaxation, etc.) they have been an extremely positive input to my improvement so far although I am still far from well (as yet!!!).

Reception at the Centre for Integrative Care, Glasgow
I am particularly confused by people's adverse reaction to homeopathic prescriptions being available on the NHS. As is usual with someone with one of more life limiting medical conditions I have to live life on social security benefits provided grudgingly by the UK state. A lot of the time therefore I must choose all ready between heat and good food, and as a result of the lack of funds and the illness I have a very limited life. Homeopathic prescriptions would therefore at most cost a maximum of about £50 per year, something I can ill afford. The number of these prescriptions is again very small in comparison to those which are of the conventional type which I receive for free. Given that they are also of more assistance in the treatment of my condition then the idea that this facility should be withdrawn is at best regressive and at worst down right nasty for very little financial benefit for the Government or Health Boards.

As is usual with someone with one of more life limiting medical conditions I have to live life on social security benefits provided grudgingly by the UK state.

I have had I believe 4 homeopathic prescriptions. 3 of these have worked, the fourth did not. If there was a placebo effect I would have thought that none of them would work, or all of them would work, not some.

In 3 of the cases through the proceeding discussion I had with the consultant I knew what these prescriptions were meant to treat, one I did not. The one which was supplied with me being unaware what it was meant to treat was one of the most successful which really rules out any placebo effect. It was to treat pain and itch (the latter being part of the irritation being experienced by the same nerves) - it virtually removed pain and reduced the itch. Perhaps another slightly different one will remove the itch which in many ways is worse than the pain and this is only achievable through consultations with a qualified homeopathic consultant.

Inside the Centre for Integrative Care, Glasgow

As with many things I am bemused as to why people who are obviously unaware of the difficulty of living with a long term condition would want to take away something which works, at worst providing comfort and hope at a time in someone's life when there is little. 

I believe the Centre for Integrative Care in Glasgow and homeopathic prescriptions actually save the NHS money (as it no longer has to supply pointless conventional medicine), improve people's quality of life and in many cases offer a life changing improvement.

For so little money spent I think the NHS Lothian, NHS Highland and NHS Lanarkshire boards and the SNP MSP hopeful Anas Hassan need to educate themselves. Willful ignorance is no defence.

If you wish to help save homeopathic services on the NHS in Scotland, in England, Wales and Northern Ireland then please sign the petition below...
https://www.change.org/p/save-nhs-homeopathy

Don't let people who know little destroy others lives even more.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amount spent on the Glasgow Homeopathic Hospital - a freedom of information request made in 2011
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/amount_spent_on_the_glasgow_home

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/amount_spent_on_the_glasgow_home
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4040/Homeopathy-works.html
I am not one to share anything from the Daily Fail lightly. 
'Each day for four weeks patients recruited from general practices and a hospital in London measured their nasal air flow and recorded symptoms such as blocked, runny or itchy nose, sneezing or eye irritation.Both groups reported that they got better - but on average patients who received homeopathy had a 28 per cent improvement in nasal air flow compared with 3 per cent among those in the placebo group.'


https://www.homeopathic.com/Articles/Homeopathic_research/Scientific_Evidence_for_Homeopathic_Medicine.html


Wednesday, 1 July 2015

How do NO voters feel, now that Westminster is taking the complete piss out of them and Scotland? They are the much vaunted "silent majority" after all.

Where is the so called ''Silent Majority'', that voted no?

They voted no, we were told, so they got as near to as federalism, so that Scotland got Super Duper devo max that was better than independence, so that ''The Vow'', was delivered. 


How do they feel, now that Westminster is taking the complete piss out of them and Scotland ?


We voted NO supposedly; so we are now powerless or as good as.
As after all they not taking the piss out of any YES voter are they, as most of us knew this would happen as Westminster have form on this over and over again.

My poster from last year seems strangely prophetic.


As the recent happenings in the House of Commons prove this is how the UK Constitution now works....

- English votes for English laws
- English votes for Scottish laws
- No Scottish votes for English laws

Scotland didn't vote for this. Does the UK care? Does Scotland care? Only time will tell.




Thursday, 7 May 2015

#toysootthepram #biggestcrisissincetheabdication #projectfear2 and all that stuff. Its now the big day!

Well here we are again on the day of a UK General Election.

So much has changed, but so much stays the same.

One of the things that has marked out this campaign, is the coverage that Scotland has been getting. The BBC has been showing Reporting North Britain (known by the BBC as Reporting Scotland), and North Britain 2015 with Sarah Smith (known by the BBC as Scotland 2015) on the BBC Parliament channel so it has been available to everyone in the UK. No other BBC ‘local’ news programme or political programme is shown on this channel on a daily basis. Nicola Sturgeon has been getting coverage and the ability to state the SNPs case outside Scotland during UK wide news and leaders debates. 

Nobody can deny that the SNP’s position in the polls has not considerably raised Scotland’s profile.

What has stayed the same is the British Establishment’s reaction to the SNP. However now it looks as though the SNP and therefore Scotland might actually have the possibility of getting something out of a UK General Election, the barbs have been getting somewhat stronger although have not been to the standard we have come to expect after the Scottish Independence Referendum campaign in the months and years leading up to September 2014.

There were murmurs of #ProjectFear2 but when a twitter storm started from disgruntled Yes supporters this very quickly seemed to peter out , although it may be resurrected at the polling stations by Labour representatives mirroring what occurred at the polling stations at the Independence Referendum.

We then had the #biggestcrisissincetheabdication from Theresa May the UK Home Secretary. True she was referring to a constitutional crisis stating that English voters would question the legitimacy of a UK Government where the SNP held sway over taxation and spending powers that would not affect their own country. She was obviously forgetting the fact that Scotland too is part of the UK (quite a common problem for those in Westminster, even for many of those elected from Scottish constituencies once they are in the Westminster bubble), the SNP are a UK political party legitimately standing for election to the UK parliament to represent Scotland, and that Scotland had to put up the same thing in the opposite direction for just under 300 years up to the re-establishment of a Scottish Parliament in 1999. After all when Scotland had 72 seats to England’s 550 there was not a great deal Scotland could do about anything as it didn’t really matter how it voted. Scotland’s views only ever mattered when they coincided with what England wanted, and that remains largely the case since 1999 in matters reserved to Westminster.

This was quickly followed by #toysootthepram Milliband, who was so harassed by the ‘impartial’ UK media, indicated that he wouldn’t even talk to the SNP if they won lots of Westminster seats in the House of Commons inferring strongly that he would therefore prefer a Tory Government rather than a left wing coalition if this coalition required the SNP to function. This indicated a lack of political maturity on his part (hence the ‘toys oot the pram’ line), but also part of the arrogance and the sense of entitlement that has come to be associated with Labour in Scotland i.e. they don’t care how people voted as everyone is going to have what Labour wants.

According to the opinion polls Scotland could be on the cusp of something historic. I can’t say as I am surprised given the infamous vow which promised the maxiest devolution but ended up a mish mash which will be a nightmare to administer and gives Scotland complete control of road signs but very little else. Everything else seems to be qualified by the requirement for a Scottish decision to be approved by Westminster which largely defeats the point unless I am missing something.

The opinion polls have been showing the SNP polling amazing numbers since late 2014 and I remain in a state of disbelief over them. If the SNP win anything above 11 seats then the result will be historic (NB: When these 11 seats were achieved in November 1974 Scotland had 72 Westminster seats). If the party gets more than 30 as looks likely then Scotland is much less likely to be ignored in future as it gives the SNP real clout. If the SNP win over 50 seats out of the possible 59 Scottish seats then I may need to call an ambulance for the shock. I have wanted the SNP to get a majority of seats in Scotland since 1978, and I honestly thought I would never be alive to see the day. However if I end up in hospital I don’t think I shall get seen very quickly because of the queue of ousted Labour MPs in front of me. If anyone reading this knows me and wonders where I am on Friday when I am not contactable I shall send you my ward number in due course.

However Scotland’s position even if the unlikely event of the SNP gaining 59 out of the available 59 seats was to actually occur then it needs to be remembered that although an amazing political statement will have been made, because Scotland remains part of the UK this will still only be a small part of the 650 seats in the House of Commons in Westminster. This is the actuality of Scotland’s position in the UK, and nobody in Scotland should forget it. It is only the fact that both major UK parties are virtually neck and neck in the rest of the UK that Scotland can have clout on this occasion.  Onwards and upwards.



Sunday, 12 April 2015

Dear Willie...

Letter sent to Willie Bain our beloved MP in Glasgow North East
Hello William,
I have just read your leaflet, as delivered to my household on 11/4/15. I have numerous questions arising from this, and would like to seek some answers from you. I hope you can take the time to answer.
The first thing that is brought to my attention is that our NHS is in "crisis". Can you please tell me why your party denied this pre-referendum?
It then says that "our families" are £1600 per year worse off under the Tories and that your Party will fight against this. May I point out that Labour voted WITH the Tories on further austerity? May I also point out that Labour have had the GNE seat for in excess of 80 years, and that it's one of the poorest constituencies in the country. I mean, the Tories haven't always been in charge....can I have your thoughts on this?
The next thing that is brought to my attention is that Labour will increase the minimum wage to £8. Other Parties have quoted £8.70 and £10 respectively, so why does £8 make you the better choice? Also, may I ask why Labour voted against the other proposed rises in favour of a lower proposal?
I then see that Labour plan to abolish "exploitative" Zero-hour contracts. It is a well known fact that in excess of 500 staff-members are employed by Labour on such contracts. Does this mean that you are admitting that your Party currently exploits people? Also, can you please explain why, after Tony Blair promised the same thing in 1995, we are still no further forward 20 years later?
The leaflet also mentions the mansion tax that your Party proposes. How many homes in Britain are worth £2m plus? I can't imagine that such tax will cover much. Can you please explain just how much this tax will cover?
I also see that you say that if we don't vote Labour, the Tories will get in. I'd like to point out that Scotland voted Labour in 1951, 1955, 1959, 1970, 1974, 1979, 1983, 1987, 1992 and 2010 and got Tory anyway? That's a staggering 10 from the last 15, so kind of disproves your notion. Can I ask why you still think that voting Labour beats the Tories?
We have here an opportunity to have a Labour/SNP government, going by the polls. Do you not think that Labour not working with the SNP would allow the Tories in? Given that your printed assertion is wrong?
I note you also mention that you are anti-austerity. May I then ask why your Party voted FOR the cuts alongside the Tories? And why Ed Balls has said he won't change any of the current Tory plans?
Moving on to the 50p tax for £150,000 plus earners. Well, there aren't many of them in the UK. In fact, the Prime Minister doesn't even earn that. So....how much will this cover?
Finally, may I ask why your leaflet does not offer any advice on what YOU will do for us? You've been my MP for 6 years, and you do not say one thing that YOU will do for GNE.
I know that's a lot of questions. But they're the questions that immediately run through my head upon reading your promotional leaflet. I hope you can answer my concerns, and convince me it is not just the "same old".
Thanks,

James Gilchrist
reproduced with the kind permission of the author.